The Cage is the Same: VOTE Statement Against ICE  

We, the staff and leadership of Voice of the Experienced (VOTE), are based in Louisiana, a state built on stolen land and forced labor. We are led by people who have lived through incarceration and its long shadow.  Our families, our histories, and our bodies carry the marks of systems built to control, extract, and disappear people deemed disposable.  

What we are witnessing with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Louisiana and across the country is not about public safety. It is state-sanctioned violence.

Policing, incarceration, detention and deportation are not separate systems. They are coordinated parts of the same machinery, designed to control, confine, and disappear people under the guise of law and order. It is the same punishment machine that has caged Black, poor and working-class people for generations, now accelerated and repackaged around a new target.

We are seeing this machinery operate in real time. ICE terror, aggressive policing, and large-scale immigrant detention are not isolated incidents. They are the strategy to implement ethnic cleansing. ICE is flooding communities with newly recruited agents lured by bonuses and fast placement, many with minimal training and unchecked authority over people’s lives. These agents implement brazen racial targeting, and sweeps moving from city to city, from New Orleans to Chicago to Minneapolis. They raid homes and businesses without warrants and are armed to the teeth. They escalate traffic stops into violence and arrest. Their deployment is often accompanied by the National Guard.  

Communities are being openly terrorized. Our neighbors are being hunted and kidnapped from neighborhoods, workplaces, schools, and immigration proceedings. Families are being driven into hiding and forced to withdraw from daily life.  Children have stopped going to school. People are now avoiding hospitals, jobs, and public spaces altogether. Witnesses and protestors to this rising authoritarianism have been met with state-sanctioned intimidation, violence, and lethal force. We are being told not to believe what we are seeing with our own eyes.  

This is not public safety. This is abusive state power that is disappearing people in plain sight, enforced through fear, force, and violence.  

Louisiana sits at the center of this machinery not because this state has more immigrants, but because it already had the carceral machinery to exploit. For generations, Louisiana has built an economy around punishment and a business out of cages. When the language shifts from “war on drugs” to “tough on crime” to “immigrant detention and deportation,” the violence always stays the same. When the state takes your body, cages you, moves you far from your people, and controls your future without your consent, that is the American carceral system. The words change. The harm does not.  

In 2017, the Justice Reinvestment Initiative was passed to reduce the Louisiana prison population. It worked. Thousands of prison beds were cleared and millions of taxpayer dollars were saved. That should have meant closing prisons. Instead, empty beds became an invitation. The state went looking for a new market and new people to fill it. First, they brought people from other states. Now they are filling those same beds with our immigrant brothers and sisters. Louisiana has a history of doing this: the immigration detention center at Jena was once a juvenile detention center.

Federal enforcement chose Louisiana because the state’s jail and prison network could be repurposed to serve an expanding deportation regime. The 1,600-bed  Winn Correctional Center in Winnfield, once a state prison, now operates as one of the largest ICE detention facilities in the country. Alexandria has become a major deportation hub, with routine deportation flights leaving from a regional airport few people ever think about. ICE has proposed building massive detention facilities on the Northshore, designed to fast-track deportations at scale, treating human beings like inventory in a warehouse. 

Immigration enforcement has never been about safety. It has always been about profit and control.  Federal custody of immigrants pays more than state custody of incarcerated people, so sheriffs, politicians, and private prison companies chase “capacity” and “infrastructure.” Through 287(g) agreements, now spreading across Louisiana, local law enforcement become deputized as immigration agents, and are rewarded financially for feeding people into the deportation pipeline. Taxpayer dollars are used, with interest, to build cages, locking future generations into debt while schools, healthcare, and coastal restoration are left to collapse. Every bed in this system is a business decision. Every transfer is a contract. Every expansion is a choice. 

We see the consequences up close. Look at East Baton Rouge Parish Prison, people are over incarcerated, neglected, and have died in a jail meant for pretrial detention. That is why VOTE Baton Rouge Organizers launched the Unjustified campaign, to expose the human, financial, and moral costs of this system and fight for safety rooted in care, not punishment. Now they want to build that jail even bigger. Bigger does not mean safer. Bigger means more bodies, more neglect, more profit. 

Look at Angola State Penitentiary, an 18,000-acre plantation prison. Camp J was its most notorious solitary and disciplinary unit, so brutal that even staff refused to work there. A federal judge declared it unconstitutional and uninhabitable, and it was shut down. Today, it has been repainted, renamed Camp 57, and reopened to hold “the worst of the worst” undocumented immigrants detained in the federal system. Same land. Same cages. New target. 

From inside Angola, one man shares: 

“Camp J, once a condemned property, is now being reopened for ICE to pack immigrants into the once infamous disciplinary camp… I don’t know how their medical needs will be met in a system already declared unconstitutional. This feels like a violation of both immigrants’ and prisoners’ civil liberties.” 

This system survives by convincing us we are separate from another. That one group can be sacrificed to protect another. But we know the truth. When they build cages for one, they are building cages for all of us. Any system designed to disappear one group will always go looking for the next. 

As formerly incarcerated people and their loved ones, we know that control does not end at the prison gate. Probation, parole, surveillance, rearrest. The form changes. The power does not. That is why we recognize this system wherever it shows up.  

If you build a system to disappear people for profit, it will always need new people to take. If you build the cages, they will fill them.  

Louisiana incarcerates more people than almost any other state. That also means Louisiana holds enormous collective power. More people who know this system. More families who have felt its harm. More communities ready to resist. VOTE calls this unification process ‘waking the sleeping giant’: When everyone touched by incarceration and state violence realizes our shared power, this system cannot stand. 

The cage is the same. 
And our liberation is tied together. 

Standing Up for Fair Housing: A Response to HUD’s Rollback on Criminal History Guidance

In November 2025, HUD Secretary Scott Turner issued a letter to Public Housing Authorities and private owners that rescinded decades of guidance on how criminal arrests and convictions should be considered in housing decisions. This dramatic policy shift threatens to destabilize families, increase homelessness, and undermine years of progress toward fair and evidence-based housing access.

For Louisiana—the most incarcerated state in the nation—the stakes couldn’t be higher. That’s why housing advocates, legal aid organizations, and community partners across the state are speaking out. Below is the letter being sent to Public Housing Authorities throughout Louisiana, urging them to maintain fair housing practices despite the federal rollback.


Dear Public Housing Authorities,  

The following organizations write to share with you our concerns about HUD Secretary Scott Turner’s November 25th letter to Public Housing Authorities and private owners of project-based rental assistance. HUD has rescinded all prior guidance regarding criminal convictions and arrest records. This decision casts aside decades of progress toward fair, evidence-based affordable housing access for people with criminal arrests and convictions.  In response, we offer the following information and perspective:  

HUD’s own mission is to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality affordable homes for all. HUD is working to strengthen the housing market to bolster the economy and protect consumers; meet the need for quality affordable rental homes; utilize housing as a platform for improving quality of life; build inclusive and sustainable communities free from discrimination and transform the way HUD does business.  

This mission can’t be met if entire families are denied housing because a family member has a past conviction, an arrest that never resulted in a finding of guilt, or a history of substance use.   

You see daily, through your work, how closely housing insecurity is tied to the criminal legal system. Our state has made intentional commitments towards rehabilitative and public health approaches to addiction, mental illness and physical disabilities. Our housing policy should not diverge from these efforts, as safe, stable housing is central to sustainability.  

Louisiana is the most incarcerated (and formerly incarcerated) jurisdiction in the world. Even more Louisianans have been sentenced to forms of “alternative” supervision, such as probation, where judges and prosecutors hope to see people, and their families, succeed when sentenced to less than jail time.  The direction suggested by HUD’s letter would lead to an unnecessary (and difficult to reverse) spike in homelessness, destabilize families, and work against court-ordered goals for rehabilitation and public safety.   

Additionally, basing housing decisions on arrests alone violates both the presumption of innocence and right to Due Process. Championing outdated “One Strike” policies, as in the recent HUD letter, not only removes discretion from local decision-makers, but also creates a heartless program that will result in devastating, and often irreversible, family separation. Additionally, these policies expose PHAs and owners to increased risk of litigation and community pushback.  

Our federal, state, and local governments have been building programs to reduce discrimination, support reentry, and keep families unified. Nothing in the Secretary’s letter requires you to abandon those efforts. You retain broad authority to  

adopt policies that promote community safety and lean into building “inclusive and sustainable communities free from discrimination.”  

Please notify us of any upcoming proposals to revise your Admissions and Continued Occupancy Policies (ACOP), Housing Voucher Administrative Plans, or related screening and termination standards. This allows us, and our partners across the state, to provide input and support policies that meet HUD’s mission while protecting the stability of Louisiana’s families.    

Thank you for your continued work and your commitment to safe, inclusive communities.   

Sign On Organizations Include:  

  • ACLU of Louisiana, Sarah Whittington, Advocacy Director  
  • Greater New Orleans Housing Alliance  
  • Housing Louisiana  
  • Housing NOLA  
  • Louisiana Parole Project  
  • Operation Restoration  
  • Power Coalition for Equity and Justice  
  • StepUp Louisiana  
  • UNITY of Greater New Orleans  
  • Vera Institute of Justice  
  • Voice of the Experienced  
  • Voters Organized to Educate  

Even The Accused Have Voting Rights

Jan 13th 2026| New Orleans Times-Picayune, Editorial Board Opinion

“Some violations of civil rights occur not by design but by situations unforeseen by the law’s designers. When this happens, the correct response is to fix the law without fuss.

That’s what Louisiana lawmakers should do in the case of people who are in jail, but not yet tried for alleged crimes, who are not allowed to vote. Unless and until they are convicted, their right to vote and their practical ability to do so must not be infringed.

Even if only a tiny subset of the population is denied its legal right to vote, provision must be made to preserve that right.

A group called Voice of the Experienced filed suit Dec. 12 in the state’s 19th Judicial District Court about this problem. State laws intended to guard against voter fraud require voters who register online or by mail to cast their ballots in person if they’ve never voted before. Exceptions are made for the disabled and military personnel deployed away from home, among others.

Whether such a restriction is wise or necessary is subject to debate, but a one-time in-person rule is no more unusual than a requirement for someone to show up in person for a first driver’s license. The civil rights problem arises only in the law’s application to those in jail awaiting trial.

Because they are in jail, it is the state itself that is keeping them from showing up in person to vote. They are literally not free to comply with his particular voting law. Yet, at the same time, the combination of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the U.S. Constitution makes it incontrovertible that, as unconnected citizens, they have absolute rights to vote.

Especially in a state that features jurisdictions with among the longest pre-trial incarcerations in the country – at some risk, by the way, of violating the Sixth Amendment’s right to a speedy trial – the problem of unconvicted inmates being unable to vote is very real. For example, the suit filed last month names Rachael Day, who has been awaiting trial for more than six years for alleged involvement in an armed robbery that turned deadly.

If Day did commit the crime, she deserves the punishment she would receive. But she should not lose her rights for a single week, much less for six years, without having her day in court.

To fix the problem would be easy. All lawmakers must do is add “unconnected people awaiting trial” to the list of exceptions (disabled, military) to the law requiring first-time voters to appear in person. After all, because they are in the state’s custody, the state already can verify their identities, which makes the possibility of voter fraud entirely moot.

It’s a simple problem with a simple fix, and lawmakers need to start fixing it on the very first day of the next session.”

Originally Published in print on January 13, 2026 in the New Orleans Times Picayune Opinion section as the Letter From The Editor (https://www.nola.com/opinions/our_views/editorial-even-the-accused-have-voting-rights/article_81a87b30-3b1a-4567-87f5-f90f853c1962.html)